64% of secondary school teachers say AI grading of written work only increased their workload
According to a report, 64% of secondary school teachers say that AI grading of written assessments only increased their workload. The result contrasts with the time savings AI grading promises.
Who is affected and how
- teacher
- Before AI grading is introduced, it should be measured how much checking and correction work it creates for teachers.
- school leader
- Before introducing a grading-support tool, it is worth assessing the time teachers spend on it.
- edtech company
- Teacher surveys call into question the time-saving promises made for products.
Sources
- 64% of secondary school teachers say AI grading of written assessments only increased their workload - NOCUTNEWSen.nocutnews.co.kr · Oct 13, 2026
- 64% of Teachers Who Tried AI Grading Say Work Increased Due to Recheckingrocketpunch.com · Oct 13, 2026
- 64% of Teachers Who Experienced AI Grading for Short/Essay Questions Say Workload Increased Due to Re-Verificationground.news · Oct 13, 2026
- 7 in 10 teachers oppose CSAT essay questions over grading disputes, AI concernsthe korea times · Oct 14, 2026
- 7 in 10 teachers oppose CSAT essay questions over grading disputes, AI concerns - The Korea Timeskoreatimes.co.kr · Oct 14, 2026
Machine-generated summary based on the titles and excerpts of the source articles. The facts come from the linked article.